The Four Paths is the classification framework at the heart of Stage 3 of the PFA Loop. Every process that reaches the Automation Decision is evaluated using the Process Readiness Score and assigned to one of four outcomes: Automate, Redesign, Instrument, or Preserve. No process advances to build without this classification.
This framework is what separates Process First Automation from every vendor-led engagement. The industry assumption is that every process is an automation candidate. The Four Paths framework treats automation as a strategic choice, not a reflex.
The default behavior in most automation engagements is to select processes that are visible, bounded, and technically approachable. Not processes that are connected to a business driver. Not processes that have been evaluated for stability or documentation quality.
The result is the Automation Reflex. The Four Paths framework is the structural interruption to that reflex and forces every process through evaluation before any technology decision is made.
The matrix above is a simplified decision tool. In practice, every process is also scored using the full five-dimension Process Readiness Score before a path is confirmed. Learn more about the Process Readiness Score
High Impact + High Stability
This process path defines the required next action, the risk posture, and the expected output before any build work starts. Path assignment is governance, not a preference.
High Impact + Low Stability
This process path defines the required next action, the risk posture, and the expected output before any build work starts. Path assignment is governance, not a preference.
Low Impact + High Stability
This process path defines the required next action, the risk posture, and the expected output before any build work starts. Path assignment is governance, not a preference.
Low Impact + Low Stability
This process path defines the required next action, the risk posture, and the expected output before any build work starts. Path assignment is governance, not a preference.
Rated 1-5 in each assessment. The composite score drives path selection with explicit thresholds.
Rated 1-5 in each assessment. The composite score drives path selection with explicit thresholds.
Rated 1-5 in each assessment. The composite score drives path selection with explicit thresholds.
Rated 1-5 in each assessment. The composite score drives path selection with explicit thresholds.
Rated 1-5 in each assessment. The composite score drives path selection with explicit thresholds.
Use this framework to classify process candidates before build work starts.
Take the AssessmentUse this framework to classify process candidates before build work starts.
Download the MatrixUse this framework to classify process candidates before build work starts.
Take the Free AssessmentYes. Path classifications are not permanent and are re-evaluated as process readiness, business conditions, and driver connection evolve.
Yes. Path classifications are not permanent and are re-evaluated as process readiness, business conditions, and driver connection evolve.
Yes. Path classifications are not permanent and are re-evaluated as process readiness, business conditions, and driver connection evolve.
Yes. Path classifications are not permanent and are re-evaluated as process readiness, business conditions, and driver connection evolve.
Yes. Path classifications are not permanent and are re-evaluated as process readiness, business conditions, and driver connection evolve.
The PFA Diagnostic produces a formal Four Paths classification for your highest-priority process candidates, backed by the full Process Readiness Score.
Continue into the next artifact connected to this stage of the methodology.
Explore the PFA LoopContinue into the next artifact connected to this stage of the methodology.
Read the vocabularyContinue into the next artifact connected to this stage of the methodology.
Browse case studies